[personal profile] the_fantastic_ms_fox

As pointed out by Rye Bunny, girls are poor

The issue of differential incomes is... tough. It's fairly clearly dodgy when you have men and women in the same job with the same credentials and the girls get paid less than the boys. It used to be that this was flat-out legal, that you could pay women assembly-line workers a lower hourly wage than men (and children less still). Nowadays, the reason for this tends to be that women ask for and/or accept lower salaries than do men. Some would say that this is fair game, but it strikes me as a bit exploitive, kind of like going camping and saddling one person with most of the gear.

Then there is the issue of "equal pay for equal work." A nurse (teacher, secretary) needs six years of training and has a union job with benefits and salary worth 'x,' where 'x' is enough to take yearly vacations in Florida and put down a mortgage on a house. Most nurses are women. Let's say a specialist doctor (professor, lawyer) with an "equal" education (equal in years? in stress? in hours of studying? in the cost of education?) makes 1.5 times 'x'. Is the nurse underpaid? I really don't care. People making a salary of x or greater are amazingly wealthy in the context of history and the globe. They really don't get my sympathy when they want more money - better or more effective working conditions yes - but not cash. Besides, the nurse could've gone into stockbroking.

Comparing or levelling incomes from the perspective of who's worth more is a can of worms. Better and simpler to go with the marxist-feminist solution and remake the economy from scratch, or just provide everyone with the basics, thus undercutting the material threats of sexism. The alternative, to have calls for salary levelling based on utility-of-work will see me, the unpublished writer of far greater skill than Steven King, calling for his advances for my novels-in-progress (calling for them from who?) as well as a benefits package for being a basically nice guy.

When it comes to differences in income, the question should be one of poverty and job risk, not priviledge. What fraction of women are poor and what fraction men? Who is more likely to be laid off when they don't sleep with the boss? Who is less likely to be hired in the first place because the boss wants someone they think is hot? Maquilas pay sub-survival wages to poor women, is this exploitive of the women or unfair to the unemployed men? While men tend to be more likely to be homeless for extended periods, women are way more likely to be living below the poverty line, to have de-skilled jobs, to work in the community for free1,  and to have to support kids with pay and scarce free time.

In conclusion, we need to genetically engineer a society of uniformly gray-skinned communist hermaphrodites2.


Thank you, and goodnight.


Graham Amy Fox




1 What about unpaid housework? Women report more hours of unpaid work in cooking, cleaning and childcare, but men tend to classify mowing the lawn, fixing the deck and de-grouting tile (I am not making this up) as “leisure.” I suppose there is always the university residence solution of “no one cleans up after themselves.”

2 Who will form a brutal caste system on the basis of eyebrow shape

Date: 2005-11-18 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greenstorm.livejournal.com
Amy Fox

Hot.

Date: 2005-11-18 07:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bthomasac.livejournal.com
I'm reminded of "Lathe of Heaven," when the character tries to remake the world so that there isn't any racism, and ends up making every single person a dull gray color.

Incidentally, Amy is the favored name of my demon prince of sloth and the flesh. Who enjoys taking the form of an innocent eight-year old girl.

So why did you end up choosing that particular name?

Date: 2005-11-20 11:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hundun.livejournal.com
Reminded? Watched me rip it off more like.

An old baby name book bears a handwritten notes that says "Amy," among other titles under "girl." Under "boy" it says "Graham." It seems to suit.

Date: 2005-11-20 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bthomasac.livejournal.com
Well, fair enough. The entire third part of "Spiritus Mundi" is probably a "rip-off cocktail" of "Promethea" and various stuff that C. S. Lewis has written ("Great Divorce" and "Perelandra" mainly).

Sure, whatever name you feel suits your femininity the most.

Date: 2005-11-20 11:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hundun.livejournal.com
Reminded? Watched me rip it off more like.

An old baby name book bears a handwritten notes under "Girl" that list "Amy" among other titles; "boy" under "Graham." It seemed to suit.

Date: 2005-11-22 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arrogant-gamer.livejournal.com
Hi

Wait, you're Graham? I amcaught off guard!

Amy Fox, I like it: three letters in each name, looks nice. Reminds me of my ax.

z.

PS you're the real Graham, right, the one from KMM?

Profile

the_fantastic_ms_fox

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 09:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios