Dec. 2nd, 2010


Globe and Mail - Why Canada should protect gender identity

Gotta stop reading stuff like this when I should be in bed.

I have the urge to comment, to maybe persuade someone. Come on girl, it's the national post. Maybe I can roll that boulder, just a bit. Debunk the washroom panic just a bit. Educate, just a bit.

Or I could sleep and do this tomorrow.
Here's another way of encapsulating my earlier point:

To use English to refer to singular humans in the gender-neutral requires either neologism or breaking grammatical rules. But why? School systems teach us English in such a way as to support some classes, ethicities and genders over others. For gender, this includes eliminating the singular "they," and designating "he" as the universal singular. Our language has already had its grammar and lexicon fucked with, but because we grew up with this, we see it as normal. We are taught that deviations are improper, or too new to use ("ze" is too weird, so people don't use it, so it's still new, so people think it's weird, repeat - but if you start using it, it starts sounding normal).

I'm not suggesting a particular pronoun, but a way of couching your choice and explanation thereof.

Profile

the_fantastic_ms_fox

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 07:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios