the_fantastic_ms_fox ([personal profile] the_fantastic_ms_fox) wrote2006-05-27 10:20 pm

I prefer my version of the ending to X3


Did anyone else notice that it changed from day to night when they were about to step off the Golden Gate bridge?



And now, the alternate postscript, cut due to test audience reaction.

"Ah, Mr... Reiner, have a seat."

"Call me 'Magneto'"

"Very well. Your resumé says that you were the leader of a non-profit youth organization..."




What about Mystique? Well, powers or no, she can still break necks with her legs, so maybe she can busk or something.



I must say, I take issue with the bulk of the good mutants being young, clean cut and played by soap opera actors, while the evil mutants who weren't uber-Goth, were ugly. This is ill on its own, but especially so given the overall theme of X-men.

[identity profile] hundun.livejournal.com 2006-05-28 06:33 am (UTC)(link)
No, but it was very clear that the mutants guarding the camp were supposed to be expendable, unkempt and troll-like - it pisses me off. I glad that there were exceptions to the Hollywood standard of beauty, even though they primarily applied to minor characters, but I don't like the impression of "these actors look like regular people, so let's make sure they just exist as goons, as opposed to the students, who look like the upper middle class ideal and are therefore the heros.

Part of this stems from the fact that looking at the profession of reconstructive surgury and the issues associated mith it.

[identity profile] breklor.livejournal.com 2006-05-29 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
The mutants guarding the camp were - I'm guessing - lifted from the Morlocks from the comic. The Morlocks were the ugly trollish mutants who couldn't pass in society, and those who didn't want to, and they all lived in the sewers and other spaces beneath New York City. So it's not just a matter of cute=good and ugly=evil. It's a matter of sloppy scriptwriting and the frantic kitchen-sink dumping of characters into an already crowded screenplay.